\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter \IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}% {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}% {\RequirePackage{color}} \usepackage{colortbl} \usepackage{wrapfig} \usepackage{ifxetex} \ifxetex \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage{xunicode} \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash} \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{} \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}} \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}} \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}} \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}} \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono} \else \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}% {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \PrerenderUnicode{–} }% {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{float} \usepackage[]{ucs} \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash } \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{} \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}} \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}} \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,} \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ } \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>} \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}} \def\textJapanese{} \def\textChinese{} \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{} \fi \def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small} \DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25} \usepackage{relsize} \RequirePackage{array} \def\@testpach{\@chclass \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@ \else \z@ \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}% \@chnum \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else \z@ \@chclass \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else \if \@nextchar !6 \else \if \@nextchar @7 \else \if \@nextchar (8 \else \if \@nextchar )9 \else 10 \@chnum \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else \if \@nextchar p4 \else \if \@nextchar b5 \else \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi} \gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr} \def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}} \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \def\abbr{} \def\corr{} \def\expan{} \def\gap{} \def\orig{} \def\reg{} \def\ref{} \def\sic{} \def\persName{}\def\name{} \def\placeName{} \def\orgName{} \def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}} \def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}} \def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}} \def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}} \def\textquoted#1{‘#1’} \def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}} \def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}} \def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}} \def\titlem{\itshape} \newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{bibl}{}{} \newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{rubric}{}{} \newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par } \newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}} \newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}} \definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75} \def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}} \DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@} \def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}} \begingroup \catcode`\_=\active \gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}} \endgroup \mathcode`\_=\string"8000 \catcode`\_=12\relax \usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry} \usepackage{framed} \definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} \usepackage{fancyvrb} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{marginnote} \renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1} \renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize} \def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif} \pagestyle{fancy} \usepackage[pdftitle={Scan to know paper details and author's profile}, pdfauthor={}]{hyperref} \hyperbaseurl{} \paperwidth210mm \paperheight297mm \def\@pnumwidth{1.55em} \def\@tocrmarg {2.55em} \def\@dotsep{4.5} \setcounter{tocdepth}{3} \clubpenalty=8000 \emergencystretch 3em \hbadness=4000 \hyphenpenalty=400 \pretolerance=750 \tolerance=2000 \vbadness=4000 \widowpenalty=10000 \renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}% {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}} \renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}% {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large}} \renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}% {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\large}} \renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}% {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\normalsize}} \renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}% {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}% {-1em}% {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}} \def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt} \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par \endgroup} \def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}} \def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}} \def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}} \def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}} \@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{} \@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{} \newif\if@mainmatter \@mainmattertrue \def\chaptername{Chapter} \def\frontmatter{% \pagenumbering{roman} \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section} \def\theHsection{\roman{section}} \def\@chapapp{}% } \def\mainmatter{% \cleardoublepage \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter} \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \pagenumbering{arabic} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6} \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}% \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section} \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}} } \def\backmatter{% \cleardoublepage \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2} \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}% \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}} \appendix } \newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{% \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}% {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}% \leftmargin\labelwidth \advance\leftmargin\labelsep \@openbib@code \usecounter{enumiv}% \let\p@enumiv\@empty \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}% }% \sloppy \clubpenalty4000 \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty \widowpenalty4000% \sfcode`\.\@m}% {\def\@noitemerr {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}% \endlist} \def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}} \parskip0pt \parindent1em \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \newenvironment{reflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{sansreflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{specHead}[2]% {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}% \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}% \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}% \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}% }{} \def\TheFullDate{1970-01-01 (revised: 01 January 1970)} \def\TheID{\makeatother } \def\TheDate{1970-01-01} \title{Scan to know paper details and author's profile} \author{}\makeatletter \makeatletter \newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{% \clearpage \if@twoside \ifodd\c@page \hbox{}\newpage \if@twocolumn \hbox{}\newpage \fi \fi \fi } \makeatother \makeatletter \thispagestyle{empty} \markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author} \renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@ \belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@ \def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep 1pt} } \makeatother \fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm} \fancyhf{} \setlength{\headheight}{14pt} \fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} \fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} \fancyfoot[RO]{} \fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID} \fancyfoot[LE]{} \fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID} \hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true} \fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}} \date{} \usepackage{authblk} \providecommand{\keywords}[1] { \footnotesize \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1 } \usepackage{graphicx,xcolor} \definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81} \definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9} \definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70} \definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} \renewenvironment{abstract}{% \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space} }{% \vskip8pt \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt } \usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos} \makeatother \usepackage{lineno} \linenumbers \begin{document} \affil[1]{ } \renewcommand\Authands{ and } \date{\small \em Received: 1 January 1970 Accepted: 1 January 1970 Published: 1 January 1970} \maketitle \begin{abstract} \end{abstract} \keywords{} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark} \end{textblock*} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}} \end{textblock*} \begin{textblock*}{10cm}(1.05cm,3cm) {{\textit{CrossRef DOI of original article:}} \underline{}} \end{textblock*}\let\tabcellsep& \section[{INTRODUCTION}]{INTRODUCTION}\par Since the beginning of the 1900s, we have transformed our view of the Universe. We learned that our galaxy is just one of many, that galaxies are racing away from each other, and that the universe's expansion is accelerating. These discoveries depended on an important finding made by Henrietta Leavitt, an American astronomer. \hyperref[b0]{[1]} In 1929, Edwin Hubble announced that almost all galaxies appeared to be moving away from us. \hyperref[b1]{[2]}[3][4] \hyperref[b4]{[5]} The velocity of a galaxy could be expressed mathematically as \hyperref[b2]{[3]} (1) ? = ??? Where v is the galaxy's radial outward velocity, d is the galaxy's distance from Earth, and H is the constant of proportionality called the Hubble constant. {\ref [6]} Today some theories have indeed become very complicated, and some have been too simple. But the fundamental ideas aren't that complex. Does the Hubble constant have this very simple relationship? And is the calculation of the age of the Universe so easy? The exact value of the Hubble constant is still somewhat uncertain but is generally believed to be around 65 kilometers per second for every megaparsec in the distance.\par [6] \hyperref[b5]{[7]} The Hubble law is in functional studies. \hyperref[b6]{[8]}\hyperref[b7]{[9]}\hyperref[b8]{[10]}\hyperref[b9]{[11]}\hyperref[b10]{[12]} The first measurement of H 0 from WMAP, in 2003, was 72 ± 5. Further results from WMAP were slightly lower: 73 in 2007, 72 in 2009, and 70 in 2011. No problem, though: the error for the SH0ES and WMAP measurements still overlapped in the 72-to-73 range. The most recent result from SH0ES at that time showed a Hubble constant of 74 ± 2, and WMAP's final result showed a Hubble constant of 70 ± 2. \hyperref[b6]{[8]} The fact that the Hubble expansion rate of the Universe changes over time teaches us that the expansion of the Universe isn't a constant phenomenon. In fact, by measuring how that rate changes over time, we can learn what our Universe is made from: this was precisely how was first discovered dark energy. \hyperref[b13]{[15]} [16] Entitling his paper "Sorry, Astronomy Fans, The Hubble Constant Isn't A Constant At All Starts With A Bang," Ethan Siegel wrote that if you measure the slope of that line, you get a value, colloquially known as the Hubble constant, still, it isn't a constant at all, as it changes over time.\par Here's the science behind why. \hyperref[b14]{[17]} Astronomers have reached a fundamental impasse in their understanding of the Universe: they cannot agree on how fast it is flying apart. And unless a reasonable explanation can be found for their differing estimates, they may be forced to completely rethink their ideas about time and space. Only new physics can now account for the cosmic conundrum they have uncovered, many believe. \hyperref[b15]{[18]} "Over the decades, these surprises have included the discovery of dark matter -believed to be made up of as yet undetected particles -whose extra gravitational pull explains why galaxies do not fly apart. In addition, astronomers have also discovered the existence of dark energy, which is accelerating the rate at which the cosmos is expanding. \hyperref[b15]{[18]} "Those two discoveries were remarkable enough," adds Riess who won his Nobel for his involvement in the discovery of dark energy. "But now we are facing the fact there may be a third phenomenon that we had overlooked -though we haven't got a clue yet what it might be." \hyperref[b15]{[18]} "Changing the Hubble constant from 67.4 to 73.5 would mean it must have been flying apart faster than previously supposed and so must be younger than its currently accepted age of 13.8bn years," says Mortlock. \hyperref[b15]{[18]} A Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics workshop in July 2019 directed attention to the Hubble constant discrepancy. New results showed that it does not appear to depend on the use of any one method, team, or source. Proposed solutions focused on the pre-recombination era. \hyperref[b16]{[19]} This paper is a summary review of a KITP-UCSB workshop convened to bring together both experimental and theoretical researchers in the field to review and assess the current state of affairs and identify promising next steps for the resolution of this issue. \hyperref[b17]{[20]}[21]\par The model is well established from decades of research and its Hubble constant prediction is supported by Planck's results, however, measurements indicate the universe is expanding faster than expected. This conflict has been growing more perplexing in recent years. {\ref [1][22]} "The Hubble constant discrepancy has been increasing, raising the possibility that we may be missing something interesting in our understanding of the universe," said SH0ES team lead Adam Riess at the Johns Hopkins University and Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore. \hyperref[b18]{[22]} So, either something is wrong with our various measurement techniques or something is wrong with our theoretical model of how the universe evolves. {\ref [} and distance in the Hubble Law is called the Hubble constant \hyperref[b7]{[9]} (it looks like the Planck constant \hyperref[b11]{[13]}), or more appropriately the Hubble parameter we have a history of revising it. In recent years the value of the Hubble parameters has been considerably refined, and the current value given by the WMAO mission is 71 km/s per second. Measurements using a variety of techniques find the Hubble constant to be about 70 to 76 kilometers per second for every megaparsec of distance (Mpc, about 3.26 million light-years). So, an object one Mpc away will move away from us at 70-76 km/s, an object two Mpc will move away at 140-152 km/s, and so on.\par [1] \hyperref[b12]{[14]} expansion rate in the modern universe than expected, based on how the universe appeared more than 13 billion years ago. These measurements of the early Universe come from the European Space Agency's Planck satellite. This discrepancy has been identified in scientific papers over the last several years, still, it has been unclear whether differences in measurement techniques are to blame or whether the difference could result from unlucky measurements. \hyperref[b20]{[24]} These most precise Hubble measurements to date bolster the idea that new physics may be needed to explain the mismatch. \hyperref[b20]{[24]} "This mismatch has been growing and has now reached a point that is impossible to dismiss as a fluke. This disparity could not plausibly occur just by chance." \hyperref[b0]{[1]}[25] \hyperref[b22]{[26]} Cosmologists have been struggling to understand an apparent tension in their measurements of the present-day expansion rate of the Universe, known as the Hubble constant. Then in 1998, Purlmutter, Schmidt, and Riess used observations of very distant galaxies to show that the Universe was not just expanding but accelerating. \hyperref[b29]{[33]}.\par London Journal of Research in Science: Natural and Formal The recent study strengthens the case that new theories may be needed to explain the forces that have shaped the cosmos. \hyperref[b20]{[24]}.\par Either way, the Hubble constant puzzle indicates something is missing from our picture of the universe.\par [1] \hyperref[b20]{[24]} And that was all it short review is about recent scientific research on the Hubble constant. \section[{II. NEW SOLUTION FOR HUBBLE PROBLEM}]{II. NEW SOLUTION FOR HUBBLE PROBLEM} \section[{Hubble Flow}]{Hubble Flow}\par Hubble's law must yield a great deal of much more information about the Universe. But it conflicts with the observations and research above talked. This contradiction is not just in minor details but is very fundamental. Hubble's law couldn't be formulated perfectly because the Hubble constant (H) is a linear relationship between the distance and velocity of the receding celestial object on a small scale (1-2 Mpc). The Hubble law was almost valid in nearby galaxies (700 Mpc) (Figure \hyperref[fig_3]{2a} and Figure \hyperref[fig_3]{2b}). But it is not constant for distant galaxies lying more than 700 Mpc. Today we can observe 14260 Mpc or 46.5 Gly in radius {\ref [34]}. I introduce that the diameter of the whole Universe is approximately 60000 Mpc, which equals 195.7 billion light years.\par [35] Of course, at that time Hubble law was a revolutionary scientific discovery. At that time, it was. Even now, not only Hubble's law (same as Einstein's photoelectric effect \hyperref[b11]{[13]}) but many phenomena haven't been explained by classical physics because they are not linear, but cyclical. As seen today, Hubble's law cannot be accurately determined without the apparent hysteresis of magnetism. Because of this, we carefully handle the 100-year-old theory of Hubble from another point of view in this chapter.\par Does the problem of Hubble's constant direct us to new physics? Or require a new consideration of an old unsolved law? Both versions maybe. I think that the reason for Hubble's problem is the unsolved old physical phenomenon of hysteresis, which has been a struggle for scientists. At first, I solved the problem to open hysteresis, then used it for solving the Hubble problem, and finally considered its results for different levels, from quantum mechanics to cosmological phenomena. It was proved to be correct and rational.\par [35] \hyperref[b30]{[37]}\hyperref[b31]{[38]}\hyperref[b32]{[39]}\hyperref[b33]{[40]} {\ref [41]}\hyperref[b35]{[42]}\hyperref[b36]{[43]}.\par London Journal of Research in Science: Natural and Formal The Hubble Flow (H(x)) is described by the following formula of the open hysteresis of the electromagnetism \hyperref[b11]{[13]}[35] \hyperref[b30]{[37]}\hyperref[b31]{[38]}\hyperref[b32]{[39]}\hyperref[b33]{[40]} {\ref [41]}\hyperref[b35]{[42]}\hyperref[b36]{[43]} (Figure \hyperref[fig_3]{2d}):\par ()\textbf{2}\par Where x is the distance unit in a circular scale.\par According to the Supreme Theory of Everything, the graph of Hubble Flow shown in red in Figure \hyperref[fig_3]{2d} shows only the whole structure of the Universe. \section[{Structure of the Universe}]{Structure of the Universe}\par The understanding of the universe depends on the key factor "Hubble flow". The curve in Figure \hyperref[fig_3]{2d} is a quarter of a full illustration in the Universe-scale. London Journal of Research in Science: Natural and Formal \section[{The Age of the Universe is Flawed}]{The Age of the Universe is Flawed}\par According to the Hubble law? = ??? [45] ? ? ( ) = ?? ? ( ) ?? ? ? ( )\par Where is the dimensionless scale factor for ? ? ( ) the expanding Universe, is the scale ? ? 0 ( ) = 1 factor at present. \section[{??? = 1}]{??? = 1}\par The scale factor R for a given observed object in the expanding Universe relative to at ? 0 = 1 present may be implied from the z parameter expression of the redshift. \hyperref[b7]{[9]} The Hubble parameter has the dimensions of inverse time, so a Hubble time may be obtained ? \section[{III. CONCLUSION}]{III. CONCLUSION}\par We summarize that:\par ? We cannot find any constant of Hubble \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png} \caption{\label{fig_0}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{1}\includegraphics[]{image-3.png} \caption{\label{fig_1}Figure 1 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-4.png} \caption{\label{fig_2}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{2}\includegraphics[]{image-5.png} \caption{\label{fig_3}Figure 2 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{3}\includegraphics[]{image-6.png} \caption{\label{fig_4}Figure 3 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-7.png} \caption{\label{fig_5}?}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{} \end{longtable} \par \begin{quote} © 2023 London Journals Press Volume 23 | Issue 1 | Compilation 1.0 Supreme Theory of Everything: It is Time to Discuss Hubble's Law\end{quote} \caption{\label{tab_0}}\end{figure} \label{foot_0}\footnote{\label{foot_0} © 2023 London Journals Press Volume 23 | Issue 1 | Compilation 1.0 Supreme Theory of Everything: It is Time to Discuss Hubble's Law} \backmatter \begin{bibitemlist}{1} \bibitem[Redshift and Law -Nasa]{b2}\label{b2} \textit{}, Hubble's Redshift , Law -Nasa . \url{https://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/redshift.html} \bibitem[Iskander et al.]{b3}\label{b3} \textit{}, Emad Iskander , Douglas Scott , Martin White . \url{https://www.astro.ubc.ca/people/scott/hubble.html} \textit{The Hubble Expansion} \bibitem[ London Journal of Research in Science: Natural and Formal]{b39}\label{b39} \textit{}, \textit{London Journal of Research in Science: Natural and Formal} \bibitem[ Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci ()]{b26}\label{b26} \textit{}, \textit{Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci} 1929. 15 p. 773. \bibitem[Riess et al. (2009)]{b10}\label{b10} ‘A redetermination of the Hubble constant with the Hubble Space Telescope from a differential distance ladder’. Adam G Riess , Lucas Macri , Others . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/539}{10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/539}. \textit{The Astrophysical Journal} 2009 July 1. 699 p. . \bibitem[Hubble ()]{b1}\label{b1} ‘A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae’. E Hubble . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.15.3.16}{10.1073/pnas.15.3.16}. \textit{Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences} 1929. 15 (3) p. . \bibitem[Tarzad and Narmandakh ()]{b33}\label{b33} ‘Batgerel Baltin \& Sangaa Deleg, Supreme Theory of everything: A New Possibility to Open the Hysteresis’. Ulaanbaatar Tarzad , Jargalan Narmandakh . \textit{London Journal of Research in Computer Science and Technology} Compilation 1.0, 2021. 21 (1) . \bibitem[Di ()]{b17}\label{b17} Eleonora Di , Valentino . \url{https://www.youtube.com/} \textit{A combined analysis of the H0 late time direct measurements and the impact on the Dark Energy sector}, 2011.00246. 3. (Further Evidence of Excess Expansion. watch?app=desktop\&t=2061\&v= 8RPoPsvd60M\&feature=youtu.be) \bibitem[Discrepancies in the Hubble Constant Have Vexed Astronomers -NASA's Roman Space -SciTechDaily -Telescope Could Help Resolve the Puzzle, NASA'S Goddard Space Flight Center ()]{b0}\label{b0} \url{https://scitechdaily.com/discrepancies-in-the-hubble-constant-have-vexed-astronomers-nasas-roman-space-telescope-could-help-resolve-the-puzzle/} \textit{Discrepancies in the Hubble Constant Have Vexed Astronomers -NASA's Roman Space -SciTechDaily -Telescope Could Help Resolve the Puzzle, NASA'S Goddard Space Flight Center}, 2021. \bibitem[Nasa's et al. ()]{b18}\label{b18} ‘Discrepancies in the Hubble Constant Have Vexed Astronomers -NASA's Roman Space Telescope Could Help Resolve the Puzzle’. Goddard Nasa's , Flight Space , Center . \url{https://scitechdaily.com/discrepancies-in-the-hubble-constant-have-vexed-astronomers-nasas-roman-space-telescope-could-help-resolve-the-puzzle/} \textit{Astronomy and Astrophysics} 2021. \bibitem[Hubble constant mismatch no fluke; new physics may be needed]{b19}\label{b19} \textit{Hubble constant mismatch no fluke; new physics may be needed}, \url{https://astronomynow.com/2019/04/27/hubble-constant-mismatch-no-fluke-new-physics-may-be-needed/} Hubble Space Telescope Science institute \bibitem[Hubble constant mismatch no fluke; new physics may be needed Astronomy Now (2019)]{b24}\label{b24} ‘Hubble constant mismatch no fluke; new physics may be needed’. \url{https://astronomynow.com/2019/04/27/hubble-constant-mismatch-no-fluke-new-physics-may-be-needed/} \textit{Astronomy Now} 27 April 2019. \bibitem[Hubble law and the expanding universe -GSU]{b7}\label{b7} \textit{Hubble law and the expanding universe -GSU}, \url{http://hyperphysics.phyastr.gsu.edu/hbase/Astro/hubble.html} \bibitem[Siegel ()]{b37}\label{b37} \textit{If The Universe Is 13.8 Billion Years Old, How Can We See 46 Billion Light Years Away?}, Ethan Siegel . \url{https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/if-the-universe-is-13-8-billion-years-old-how-can-we-see-46-billion-light-years-away-db} 2018. p. 3. \bibitem[Siegel ()]{b38}\label{b38} \textit{If The Universe Is 13.8 Billion Years Old, How Can We See 46 Billion Light Years Away?}, Ethan Siegel . \url{https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/if-the-universe-is-13-8-billion-years-old-how-can-we-see-46-billion-light-years} 2018. p. 3. \bibitem[Is the Hubble constant not?Constant? -??? ?|????]{b23}\label{b23} \url{https://www.jszsoft.net/2022/10/29/is-the-hubble-constantnotconstant-2/} \textit{Is the Hubble constant not?Constant? -??? ?|????}, \bibitem[Mckie]{b15}\label{b15} Robin Mckie . \url{https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/nov/02/hubble-constant-mystery-that-keeps-getting-bigger-estimate-rate-expansion-universe-cosmology-cepheid} \textit{The Hubble constant: a mystery that keeps getting bigger}, \bibitem[Mystery of the universe's expansion rate widens with new Hubble data]{b20}\label{b20} \url{https://phys.org/news/2019-04-hubble-universe-faster} \textit{Mystery of the universe's expansion rate widens with new Hubble data}, (htm l 25) \bibitem[Mystery of Universe's Expansion Rate: Hubble Data Shows That "Something Weird Is Going On, Astronomy, Astrophysics, Hubble Space Telescope NASA Popular Space Telescope Science Institute ()]{b13}\label{b13} ‘Mystery of Universe's Expansion Rate: Hubble Data Shows That "Something Weird’. \textit{Is Going On, Astronomy, Astrophysics, Hubble Space Telescope NASA Popular Space Telescope Science Institute} 2022. \bibitem[National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center]{b5}\label{b5} \url{https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/education/graphic\textunderscore history/hubb\textunderscore const.html} \textit{National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center}, Hubble Constant \bibitem[Bennett et al. ()]{b8}\label{b8} ‘Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results’. C L Bennett , D Larson , J L Weiland , E L Wright . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20}{10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20}. \textit{The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series} 2012. 208 (2) . (Show all 21 authors) \bibitem[Panek]{b6}\label{b6} Richard Panek . \url{https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-a-dispute-over-a-single-number-became-a-cosmological-crisis/} \textit{How a Dispute over a Single Number Became a Cosmological Crisis}, \bibitem[Peebles]{b4}\label{b4} P J E Peebles . \url{//ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Peebles1/frames.html} \textit{the Standard Cosmological Modelhttps}, \bibitem[Probing the Hubble Constant with NASA's Roman Space Telescope, Nancy Grace Roman space telescope Goddard Space Flight Center]{b12}\label{b12} ‘Probing the Hubble Constant with NASA's Roman Space Telescope, Nancy Grace Roman space telescope’. \url{https://roman.gsfc.nasa.gov/feature\textunderscore hubble\textunderscore constant.html} \textit{Goddard Space Flight Center}, \bibitem[Scolnic]{b9}\label{b9} Dan Scolnic . \url{https://indico.cern.ch/event/615891/contributions/2643252/attachments/1507549/2349644/tevpa\textunderscore scolnic.pdf} \textit{New Measurements of the Hubble Constant}, The National Science Foundation, University of Chicago \bibitem[Sorrell ()]{b21}\label{b21} Wilfred H Sorrell . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10509-009-0057}{10.1007/s10509-009-0057}. \url{zhttps://files.core.ac.uk/pdf/2612/81847289.pdf} \textit{Misconceptions about the Hubble recession law}, 2009. 323 p. . \bibitem[Sorrell ()]{b27}\label{b27} Wilfred H Sorrell . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10509-009-0057}{10.1007/s10509-009-0057}. \url{https://files.core.ac.uk/pdf/2612/81847289.pdf} \textit{Misconceptions about the Hubble recession law}, 2009. 323 p. . \bibitem[Tarzad]{b32}\label{b32} ‘Supreme Theory of Everything’. Ulaanbaatar Tarzad . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.33140/ATCP.02.02.05}{10.33140/ATCP.02.02.05}. Advances in Theoretical \& Computational Physics 2 p. . \bibitem[Ulaanbaatar ()]{b31}\label{b31} ‘Supreme theory of everything’. T Ulaanbaatar . DOI 10 4172/2329-6542-C7-035. \textit{J. Astrophys. Aerospace Technol} 2018. 6. \bibitem[Tardad ()]{b11}\label{b11} ‘Supreme Theory of Everything: A New Quantum Concept of the Photoelectric Effect’. Ulaanbaatar Tardad . \textit{London Journals of Research in Science: Natural and Formal}, 2022. 22 p. . \bibitem[Tarzad]{b35}\label{b35} ‘Supreme Theory of Everything: Geometric Methods for the Complex Analysis’. Ulaanbaatar Tarzad . \textit{Journal of Current Trends in Physics Research and Applications, App} 2 (1) p. 2021. \bibitem[Tardad (2022)]{b36}\label{b36} ‘Supreme Theory of Everything: Special Theory of Relativity Was Lost from the Beginning’. Ulaanbaatar Tardad . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2022.1012244}{10.4236/jamp.2022.1012244}. \textit{Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics} December 2022. 10 (12) . \bibitem[Koberlein (2013)]{b29}\label{b29} ‘Supreme Theory of Everything: Whole Universe in a Simple Formula’. Brian Koberlein . \url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable\textunderscore universe35} \textit{The observable universe}, (Ulaanbaatar, T.) 10 October 2013. 20 p. . (How Far We've Come. Issue 5 | Compilation 1.0, p) \bibitem[Tarzad (2018)]{b30}\label{b30} Ulaanbaatar Tarzad . \textit{Supreme Theory of Everything, 4 th International Conference on Astrophysics and Particle Physics}, (Chicago, USA) December 03-05. 2018. Holiday Inn Chicago O'Hare. \bibitem[Verde et al. ()]{b16}\label{b16} ‘Tensions between the Early and late Universe’. Licia Verde , Tommaso Treu , Adam G Riess . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0}{10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0}. \url{https://www.researchgate} \textit{London Journal of Research in Science: Natural and Formal} 2019. 3 (10) . (Nature Astronomy) \bibitem[Siegel et al. ()]{b14}\label{b14} \textit{The Hubble Constant Isn't A Constant At All Starts With A Bang}, Ethan Siegel , Astronomy Sorry , Fans . \url{https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2019/08/02/sorry-astronomy-fans-the-hubble-constant-isnt-a-constant} 2019. Contributor Group (sh=7f40b42 99d59) \bibitem[Overduin and Martin; Wesson ()]{b22}\label{b22} \textit{The light/dark universe: light from galaxies, dark matter, and dark energy}, James Overduin , Paul S Martin; Wesson . \url{https://briankoberlein.com/post/how-far-weve-come/} 2008. World Scientific Publishing. p. 10. \bibitem[Overduin and Martin; Wesson ()]{b28}\label{b28} \textit{The light/dark universe: light from galaxies, dark matter, and dark energy}, James Overduin , Paul S Martin; Wesson . 2008. World Scientific Publishing. p. 10. \bibitem[Ulaanbaatar Tarzad, Formula Extraction in Supreme Theory of Everything London Journal of Research in Science: Natural and Formal]{b34}\label{b34} ‘Ulaanbaatar Tarzad, Formula Extraction in Supreme Theory of Everything’. \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.33140/ATCP.02.04.01}{10.33140/ATCP.02.04.01}. 33 140/ ATCP.02.04.01. \textit{London Journal of Research in Science: Natural and Formal} 41. (Advances in Theoretical \& Computational Physics) \bibitem[Weaver et al. ()]{b25}\label{b25} Donna Weaver , / Ray Villard , Adam Riess , Claire Andreoli . \url{https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2019/mystery-of-the-universe-s-expansion-rate-widens-with-new-hubble-data} \textit{Mystery of the Universe's expansion rate widens with new Hubble data}, 2019. \end{bibitemlist} \end{document}