Simulation and Optimization of a Natural Gas Dehydration Plant with Triethylene Glycol

Authors

  • Dr. Minister Obonukut

Keywords:

natural gas, dehydration, triethylene glycol, absorber, regenerator

Abstract

Dehydration of Natural Gas has been a subject of interest for decades due to the effect of wet gas on the system. Specifically, the gas’ heating value and its flow assurance are challenged coupled with not meeting markets’ specification. Besides these flow assurance and related issues, the hydrate in the gas quickly deactivate catalyst and burn less. This study attempts to economically dehydrate the gas using Triethylene Glycol (TEG) which has to be optimally regenerated and used for further dehydration process. The simulation and optimization of the dehydration process through absorption with TEG was carried out using Aspen HYSYS software and Design-Expert software respectively. The simulation was carried out using Glycol and Peng-Robinson as the thermodynamic fluid package. Effects of parameters such as TEG circulation rate, equilibrium stages of absorption column, operating conditions on the process efficiency were investigated. It was found that, lowering the pressure in the absorption column reduces the amount of hydrocarbons trapped in the wet TEG stream leaving the bottom of the absorber. The optimization of the Recycled TEG was carried out using the numerical optimization of the Design-Expert software, the experimental design was based on the Central Composite Design of the Response Surface Methodology of Design-Expert version 10, this optimization yield a relative increase in TEG recycled stream from 99.59 mole% to 99.89 mole% at an optimum operating parameters of 25oC, 6320 kpa and 1883 kgmole/h of the wet gas stream. 

References

S. Abdulla (2015) Simulation of Pumps by Aspen Plus. 4(3), 2-45.

D. U. Afaiko (2014) Maximizing the efficiency of natural gas dehydration process with triethylene glycol using Aspen HYSYS.

S. Affandy, J. Renanto, L. Chien (2017) Simulation and optimization of structured packing replacement in absorption column of natural gas dehydration unit using triethylene glycol (TEG).

S. Affandy, A. Kurniawan, R. Handogo, J. Sutikno, I. Chien (2020) Technical and economic evaluation of triethylene glycol regeneration process using flash gas as stripping gas in a domestic natural gas dehydration unit. 2(4), 1-3.

S. Ahmed, A. Nadia, A. Said (2019) Gas Condensate Stabilization Methods: Optimum Operating Conditions. 8(3), 1643-1648.

J. Akpabio, P. Bassey, O. Ajie, M. E. Obonukut (2021) Development of a Model Predicting Rate of Wax Deposition in Production Tubing: A Flow Assurance Study.

D. Appah (2014) Energy Challenge for Nigerian Industrial Revolution Plan: The Way Forward.

A. Bahadori (2014) Natural gas processing: Technology and Engineering Design.

R. Chebbi, M. Qasim, A. N. (2019) Optimization of Triethylene Glycol Dehydration of Natural Gas. 5, 723-732.

J. R. Elliot, C. T. Lira (1999) Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics.

David Gray, Glen Tomlinson, John Shen (1990) Direct Methane Conversion: An Assessment. 432-435.

A. Holmen (2009) Direct Conversion of Methane to Fuels and Chemicals. 142, 2-8.

Z. Kamin, A. Bono, L. Leong (2017) Simulation and optimization of the utilization of triethylene glycol in a natural gas dehydration process. 12(4), 1-9.

J. Kong, Z. Mahmoud, A. Liu, S. Sunarso (2018) Revamping existing glycol technologies in natural gas dehydration to improve the purity and absorption efficiency: Available methods and recent developments. 56, 486-503.

W. Luyben (2011) Principles and Case Studies of Simultaneous Design.

S. Mokhatab, J. Y. Mak, W. A. Poe (2019) Process Modelling and Simulation of Gas Processing Plants.

M. Neagu, D. Cursaru (2017) Technical and economic evaluations of the triethylene glycol regeneration processes in natural gas dehydration plants. 37, 327-340.

M. Netusil, P. Ditl (2011) Comparison of three methods for natural gas dehydration. 20(5), 471-476.

M. E. Obonukut, S. B. Alabi, P. G. Bassey (2016) Steam Reforming of Natural Gas: Value Addition to Natural Gas Utilization in Nigeria. 10(1), 2841.

S. Partho, Ruhul A. (2011) Aspen-HYSYS Simulation of Natural Gas Processing Plant. 62-65.

M. S. Patel, S. F. Wong, D. A. Storm (2005) Retrofitting Methanol Plants for Higher Alcohols.

K. Pezman, Roya H. (2011) Sensitivity Analysis of a Natural Gas Triethylene Glycol Dehydration Plant in Persian Gulf Region. 53(1), 71-77.

M. R. Rahimpour, S. M. Jokar, P. Feyzi, R. Asghari (2013) Investigating the performance of dehydration unit with Coldfinger technology in gas processing plant. 471-476.

M. Saeid, William A., J. Poe, G. Speight (2006) Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing.

Sanggyu I., Sung-heechoi, Yeongbeom I., Kyusang C., Young-myung Y. (2011) The study on a new liquefaction cycle development for LNG plant.

T. Shoaib, A. Bhran, A. Awad, M. El-Sayed (2018) Optimum operating conditions for improving natural gas dew point and condensate throughput. 49, 324%E2%80%93330.

N. Siti, Abdul G. (2012) Simulation of Typical Natural Gas Dehydration Unit using Glycol Solutions. 8(2), 27-31.

M. Stewart, K. Arnold (2011) Gas Sweetening and Processing Field Manual. 51%E2%80%9352.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-11

How to Cite

Simulation and Optimization of a Natural Gas Dehydration Plant with Triethylene Glycol. (2022). London Journal of Engineering Research, 22(1), 61-74. https://www.journalspress.uk/index.php/LJER/article/view/404