The Set Ordering Method for Scoring the Outcomes of 1-2-3-4 Multistage Model of Computerized Adaptive Testing
Keywords:
Instructor quality, Teacher self-efficacy, teacher student relationshipAbstract
The paper presented considers the ordering method of outcome set for multi-stage testing (MST) of 1-2-3-4 model. The ordering method of outcome set is used for the estimation of results of computerized adaptive testing (CAT). This method is not tied to a specific testing procedure.
Acknowledgment of this is its usage for the 1-2-3-4 model, which is described in the paper. To sort the set of testing outcomes, the function-criteria described in the initial article are used here and a comparative analysis of obtained results is performed. The ordered outcome set is estimated by a hundred-point system according to the normal distribution.
Applied results of our scientific research is developed as “Adaptester” portal andavailable on the following address: ttps://adaptester.com
References
F. Baker (2001) The basics of item response theory. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED084302.pdf
N. Betz, D. J. Weiss (1973) An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED084302.pdf
N. Betz, D. J. Weiss (1974) An empirical study of computer-administered two-stage ability testing. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED103466.pdf
N. E. Betz, D. J. Weiss (1975) Empirical and simulation studies of flexilevel ability testing. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED111861.pdf
K. Crotts, S. G. Sireci, A. Zenisky (2012) Evaluating the Content Validity of Multistage-Adaptive Tests. 13(#1). https://bit.ly/2OhomVo
S. E. Embretson, S. P. Reise (2000) Item response theory for psychologists.
S. Kim, T. Moses (2014) An Investigation of the Impact of Misrouting Under Two-Stage Multistage Testing: A Simulation Study. https://bit.ly/2yFxsDv
K. C. Larkin, D. J. Weiss (1975) An empirical comparison of two-stage and pyramidal adaptive ability testing. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED106317.pdf
R. M. Luecht, R. J. Nungester (1998) 35.
Frederique M. Lord (1970) The self-scoring flexilevel test. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EDo42813.pdf
G. J. Melican, K. Breithaupt, Y. Zhang (2010) Designing and implementing a multistage adaptive test. 167-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85461-8
J. R. McBridge, D. J. Weiss (1976) Some properties of a bayesian adaptive ability testing strategy. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED121819.pdf
A. Pyper, M. Lilley, P. Wernick, A. Jefferies (2014) A simulation of a flexilevel test.
G. Rasch (1980) Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests.
S. Razmadze, M. Razmadze, T. Razmadze (2017) The set ordering method for scoring the outcomes of testing in computerized adaptive testing. 8(5). https://bit.ly/2INL4Rt
S. Razmadze (2019) The Set Ordering Method for Scoring the Outcomes of 1-2-4 Multistage Model of Computerized Adaptive Testing. 9(1), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.am.20190901.02
L. M. Rudner (2009) Scoring and classifying examinees using measurement decision theory. 14(8).
W. J. Van der Linden, R. K. Hambleton (1997) Handbook of item response theory.
H. Wainer, G. L. Kiely (1987) 24, 185-201.
X. Wang, E. T. Bradlow, H. Wainer (2002) A General Bayesian Model for Testlets: Theory and Applications.
B. K. Waters (1977) An empirical investigation of the stratified adaptive computerized testing model. http://iacat.org/sites/default/files/biblio/v01n1p141.pdf
D. J. Weiss (1973) The stratified adaptive computerized ability test. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EDo84301.pdf
D. J. Weiss (1974) Strategies of adaptive ability measurement. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED104930.pdf
A. Zenisky, R. K. Hambleton, R. M. Luecht (2010) Multistage testing: Issues, designs, and research. 355-372.
Y. Zheng, H. Chang (2015) On-the-fly assembled multistage adaptive testing. 39(2), 104%E2%80%93118. https://bit.ly/2vDkUMa
Y. Zheng, Y. Nozawa, X. Gao, H. Chang (2012) Multistage adaptive testing for a large-scale classification test: Design, heuristic assembly, and comparison with other testing modes.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
